I performed some simulations earlier and my results suggested that as long as you keep the COP to 6 or less, then the system will be stable with a heat type of control. This matches the gas concept as long as he is careful not to overheat the device.
I still see that Rossi always insists that the COP is limited to 6 and he has been asked if it would be larger on many occasions in his journal. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Fri, Aug 10, 2012 4:20 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gas driven E-cat Thisimplies no computer controls. The Rossi reaction must still bethermionic. Cheers: Axil On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Michele Comitini <michele.comit...@gmail.com> wrote: I suppose he is speaking of methane. No need for electrical power anymore. Seems that Rossi is leaving "competition" in the dust. Read below. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=679&cpage=3#comment-299135 Andrea Rossi August 10th, 2012 at 11:54 AM ... We are very close to a 1 MW plant with high temperature steam and electric power generation. Another important achievement , we got today: we are able, now, to make the drive with gas instead of electric power. This is extremely important, because now we are able to make thermal energy with thermal energy, and with the thermal energy produced we can make electric power. All this with 1 MW plants. Warm Regards, Andrea Rossi mic
