Notice that here is no radio frequency generators used now.
Cheers: Axil On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:24 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > I performed some simulations earlier and my results suggested that as long > as you keep the COP to 6 or less, then the system will be stable with a > heat type of control. This matches the gas concept as long as he is > careful not to overheat the device. > > I still see that Rossi always insists that the COP is limited to 6 and he > has been asked if it would be larger on many occasions in his journal. > > Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Fri, Aug 10, 2012 4:20 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gas driven E-cat > > This implies no computer controls. The Rossi reaction must still be > thermionic. > > Cheers: Axil > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Michele Comitini < > michele.comit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I suppose he is speaking of methane. No need for electrical power >> anymore. Seems that Rossi is leaving "competition" in the dust. Read >> below. >> >> >> http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=679&cpage=3#comment-299135 >> >> Andrea Rossi >> August 10th, 2012 at 11:54 AM >> ... >> We are very close to a 1 MW plant with high temperature steam and >> electric power generation. Another important achievement , we got >> today: we are able, now, to make the drive with gas instead of >> electric power. This is extremely important, because now we are able >> to make thermal energy with thermal energy, and with the thermal >> energy produced we can make electric power. All this with 1 MW plants. >> Warm Regards, >> Andrea Rossi >> >> >> mic >> >> >
