I am curious about the "weak and erratic" comment. What about evidence like this -
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Dash-Effect%20of%20Recrystallization-Paper.pdf This doesn't look that hard to reproduce - the main problem is access to the spectrometer-equipped SEM, which is not the sort of power tool found in the average garage. ;-) I've no idea how common these devices are. Anyway, have their been attempts/failures to reproduce this kind of work? Jeff On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jouni Valkonen <jounivalko...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On 17 August 2012 19:58, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> 5) Helium ash is often seen with Pd-D but no helium is seen with >> Ni-H. >> >> But have we looked for helium in Ni-H systems? I would doubt that because > Ni-H is rather new way to produce excess heat and it is not well > established. There are not much scientific papers published on Ni-H system > and I would guess that there are zero scientific papers, where > helium/tritium was searched from Ni-H system that sustained clear anomalous > heat effect, such as Celani's cell. > > My bets are still that both systems are based on light element fusion > reactions. Also helium, helium-3, lithium and boron should be researched > well. I think that the evidence for any transmutations of heavy elements is > just too weak and erratic although it should be easily detectable e.g. from > Celani's cell. > > –Jouni >
