That paper certainly didn't cheer me up. Indeed it made me very sad.
"Myonic fusion?" Yes, I know what they meant. The paper reads like it
was written with Voice Recognition software, without editing, more or
less off-the-cuff, by someone who knows a lot but is utterly
disorganized.
The neutron experiment isn't clearly described in this paper. It's
apparently in another conference paper....
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 19, 2012, at 11:07 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Abd,
Firstly, cheer up a bit.
Way too much hostility.
The proceedings paper is at:
"Surface Effect for Gas Loading Micrograin Palladium for Low Energy
Nuclear Reactions LENR"
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS&PROFESSORS/pdf/LENR%20Korea%20ProceedXX.pdf
They sound quite confident that they can reproduce the effect at
will now
- and they regard the intensity of neutron generation as a milestone.
The transmutations may indicate D-D fusions along with other complex
multibody reactions.
Unless they badly misinterpreted all of their instrument readings,
more
detail and replications should follow.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 01:27 PM 8/18/2012, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Hello Akira,
I can't see any "bad news".
If I'm correct, Miley's team reports a much more robust reaction
than
previously seen, along with a variety of extremely anomalous
transmutations.
Where is the report? Miley's reports of transmutations are not new.
The slide show that was at the head of this thread is very shallow,
mostly large print red statements with little data.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS%26PROFESSORS/pdf/LENR%20Korea%20ICCF-17%20Poster.pdf
So what is pagnucco's statement based on?
I've no difficulty at all accepting a wide variety of transmutations.
Any fusion reaction is likely to lead to at least some of these. The
neutron report is far outside the norm, however.
I'm waiting to see a more complete report than that slide show! It is
practically unintelligible.
