hello,

here is interesting and easy concept for perpetual motion machine using 
magnets. Problem: why this is not accepted as perpetual motion machine? I do 
not see anything wrong with this concept, but it clearly produces more 
rotational energy that easily overcomes the friction. 

Evolution of perpetual motion
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqG-TL0WnjE

I do not think that this has commercial relevance as free energy generator, 
because solar, wind and nuclear are far cheaper free energy resources that will 
last billions of years. But as perpetual motion, this should be a proof of 
concept. 

However I do not think that it is anymore complex idea than refrigerator magnet 
that is doing endless work against gravity or electron that can orbit nucleus 
without losing it's energy. Earth revolves around the sun and that is also 
perpetual motion. In sum: in quantum universe there are no room for classical 
physics.

It is also interesting to ponder that around 2030 solar electricity will be far 
cheaper than electricity generated using cold fusion. That is because PV-cells 
do not have moving parts and as they are semiconductors, their cost 
effectiveness is evolving exponentially. Price of electricity generated using 
PV-cells has halved around every six years for the past 33 years. In March 2012 
industrial scale solar electricity price was $151 per MWh and if this trend 
continues, like it is hugely probable, solar electricity is by 2021 cheaper 
than coal power and by 2030 it will be cheaper than cold fusion electricity, 
and after that, it will be too cheap to meter!

―Jouni

Reply via email to