Jones, I read his patent months ago. He may address this there. I need to re-read it.
LP Jones Beene wrote: > Ahern under-emphasizes the "super-radiance" and "sub-radiance" balance in > this paper. If he had made DPSR clear, then there is no primary violation. > > DPSR - Dicke-Preparata super-radiance - proposes that certain spatial > areas > can undergo intense semi-coherent energy excursions (localized energy > extremes) which are nominally perfectly balanced against adjoining areas, > where kinetics are correspondingly muted. At this primary level there is > no > gain. > > However, it is during a local excursion that a secondary reaction can > occur, > which does indeed violate CoE, to the extent it is gainful in itself. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com > > His example of spring coupled point masses seems to circumvent the 2nd Law > of Thermodynamics, by focusing rather than diffusing kinetic energy. > > As in endothermic chemical reactions, this is (probably) just an apparent > violation of the 2nd Law, except occurring at nuclear/particle scales. > > > > > > >
