This increase in conductivity is casued by the formation of cooper pairs of protons through the action of thr Shukla-Eliasson Attractive Force. See my last post - Friedel oscillations
Cheers: Axil On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM, David L Babcock <ol...@rochester.rr.com>wrote: > For any here puzzled- > Pointing out the obvious: > If, while temperature is rising, some increasing portion of a resistive > conductor becomes superconductive, the overall resistance of the entire > conductor will decrease. If this decrease exceeds an increase which > temperature rise is causing at the same time, you get non-monotonic > resistivity vs temp. > > Ol' Bab > > > On 9/12/2012 1:36 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: > >> Jeff, >> >> The reports cited in the presentation are of hi-temp superconductivity (I >> believe), rather than just non-monotonic resistivity vs. temp phenomena. >> >> It may be worth looking at the recently reported hi-temp superconductivity >> seen in fractal materials - e.g., >> >> "High-temperature superconductivity: The benefit of fractal dirt" >> http://www.nature.com/nature/**journal/v466/n7308/full/**466825a.html<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v466/n7308/full/466825a.html> >> >> "Fractals make better superconductors" >> http://www.nanotech-now.com/**news.cgi?story_id=39593<http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=39593> >> >> "Fractals promise higher-temperature Superconductors" >> http://www.stealthskater.com/**Documents/Fractals_04.pdf<http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Fractals_04.pdf> >> >> "X-rays control disorder in superconductor" >> http://physicsworld.com/cws/**article/news/2011/aug/31/x-** >> rays-control-disorder-in-**superconductor<http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/aug/31/x-rays-control-disorder-in-superconductor> >> >> "Fractals boost superconductivity" >> http://physicsworld.com/cws/**article/news/2010/aug/13/**fractals-boost-* >> *superconductivity<http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2010/aug/13/fractals-boost-superconductivity> >> >> -- Lou Pagnucco >> >> >> >> Jeff Berkowitz wrote: >> >>> To answer my own question: yes, here >>> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/**CelaniFcunimnallo.pdf<http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFcunimnallo.pdf>on >>> page 3, in item (3) >>> of the numbered list. >>> >>> Of course, it could be some unrelated effect; but decreasing electrical >>> resistance with increasing temperature is very odd, and it certainly is >>> an >>> interesting coincidence. >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Jeff Berkowitz <pdx...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Lasers not necessary? Hasn't Celani been reporting a negative >>>> temperature >>>> coefficient of resistance that appears about the time his processed >>>> wires >>>> begin producing heat? I might have this wrong ... >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> "Low Energy Neutron Reaactions (LENRs)" >>>>> >>>>> http://www.slideshare.net/**lewisglarsen<http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen> >>>>> -- or at -- >>>>> >>>>> http://www.slideshare.net/**slideshow/embed_code/14256059?** >>>>> hostedIn=slideshare&referer=**http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.** >>>>> net%2Flewisglarsen#<http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14256059?hostedIn=slideshare&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Flewisglarsen#> >>>>> >>>>> - proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface >>>>> plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the >>>>> interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively >>>>> oscillating protons. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps this is testable using laser pulses, as described in - >>>>> >>>>> "Surface plasmon enhanced electron acceleration with few-cycle laser >>>>> pulses" >>>>> http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/**DombiLPB27_291.pdf<http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/DombiLPB27_291.pdf> >>>>> >>>>> - since they can create field gradients of at least 3.7 X 10^11 V/m >>>>> (p.293) >>>>> >>>>> -- Lou Pagnucco >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
