Video #11, tends to support my belief that the power, force, and speed of gas expansion is inversely proportional to the duration of the spark. When the duration of the spark is short, the compressive force of the gas grows large. A very short spark is a powerful spark. This powerful spark will produce a powerful and forceful expansion of the gas.
To get gas expansion to the maximum, the duration of the spark must be reduced to the minimum duration possible. To optimize gas performance, I recommend a spark rise time under 50 nanoseconds with a very short duration to produce the most powerful explosive and forceful expansion of the gas. Video #11 shows that a continuous high voltage spark does not cause gas expansion, but a short and powerful spark with a very short duration does. It is not the energy that the spark carries in joules. It is how fast this energy is delivered to the gas. This is analogous to how explosives perform. Low explosives are compounds where the rate of decomposition proceeds through the material at less than the speed of sound. The decomposition is propagated by a flame front (deflagration) which travels much more slowly through the explosive material than a shock wave of a high explosive. High explosives are explosive materials that detonate, meaning that the explosive shock front passes through the material at a supersonic speed. Some theory Because of the Pauli Exclusion Principle, no two electrons can orbit the atom on the same quantum level. Electron degeneracy pressure is a particular manifestation of the more general phenomenon of quantum degeneracy pressure. The Pauli Exclusion Principle disallows two half integer spin particles (fermions, that is electrons) from simultaneously occupying the same quantum state. The resulting emergent repulsive force is manifested as a pressure against compression of matter into smaller volumes of space. Electron degeneracy pressure results from the same underlying mechanism that defines the electron orbital structure of elemental matter. When electrons are squeezed too close together, the exclusion principle requires them to have different energy levels. To add another electron to a given volume requires raising an electron's energy level to make room, and this requirement for energy to compress the material appears as a pressure. A big spark packs large numbers of electrons into fixed volume in a very short amount of time and the gas explodes due to electrostatic increasing repulsion. At any given instant, the more electrons that are added to a gas, the bigger the gas atoms gets in that fixed timeframe. This causes electrostatic pressure increase as all the atoms of the gas grow bigger at the same fixed instant of time. If the spark pulse is short and powerful enough, an electrostatic shock wave may be produced that may then result in an intense level of compression and electron nuclear screening which then results in associated nuclear reactions. It is well known the lightning produces gamma rays neutrons and transmutation of matter. This electrostatic shock wave may be causing this type of nuclear activity. QED. On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > It's not exactly a proof of principle - and in fact it is closer to a > disproof of principle. > > He gets little to no effect from the Noble gas mixture, but gets an > interesting effect from hydrogen. It is probably a hydrino effect. The > violet color is indicative of UV emission, which is the signature of the > Mill's f/H reaction. > > Papp says over and over that he does not use hydrogen in his mix, and the > Rohner's agree. Therefore since hydrogen gives a rather strong effect, and > the Nobel gas mix gives almost none, by comparison, this amounts to a > rather > compelling disproof of principle for Papp and/or a putative NGE. > > Jones > > From: Axil Axil > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBWiWftGknI&list=UULuDKTNDFfat7iO7KGE7fQA&in > dex=1&feature=plcp<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBWiWftGknI&list=UULuDKTNDFfat7iO7KGE7fQA&index=1&feature=plcp> > >
