"Names of the testers and the organizations they represent are still under strict NDAs and have therefore been removed from the attached documents. Defkalion will not disclose names."
http://www.lenrforum.eu/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=749&p=2692#p2692 My opinion is such, but I'm not expert, just trusting the professionals. You critics welcome: The protocol is simple flow calorimetry with aqueous fluid (glycol+water, or water). Tester is happy with DGT cooperation and sincerity. The results imply sure a COP>3. Not chemical for sure. Test repeated. Calibration coherent. Reaction is controlled at will. The flow calorimetry with those fluid does not allow good performance. As said before test lead to sparkplug shorting, even breaking a test in process at the end. It work, yet performance shown are not fantastic, because of sparkplug for endurance, because of fluid used for calorimetry setup about performance. Normally non chemical COP>3 is a revolution in physics, but I expect nobody except us will care, as for the rest. Maybe the name of the tester can change that, but there are already big name, and the only names that I imagine powerful enough are "Science Magazine", "Scientific American", "MIT boss". Even Nasdaq, DowJones companies, or N/Dxxx state institutions cannot. 2012/10/19 Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> > > Test Results: > > Defkalion demonstrated > 1 COP of accumulated total energy output > divided by accumulated total energy input (exact total COP will be > provided in final report) > > Defkalion demonstrated control of reaction (start, stop, increase, > decrease) > > Defkalion demonstrated a reaction output greater than equivalent > chemical energy from mass of internal components > > [But the signature of the third party is blacked out. Why??] > > >
