I regret that I have not been able to understand this paper. What I
find here are equations from various areas of physics -- electrostatics,
quantum mechanics, etc -- together with a a few general remarks about
those equations. So, for example, it is not clear to me what is the
central result in this paper. Is there, for example, being claimed a
new physical theory? or some new predictions extracted from the old
theory? My sense is that it is probably neither of these -- but that,
rather, the claim is that these considerations lead to a better or
deeper understanding of these equations.
But I am afraid that I, having read this paper, simply do not have
this sense. Indeed, I cannot honestly say that I have been able to
get a good sense of what the is the thrust of the paper. For this
reason, I do not feel that this paper is suitable for publication in
the Foundations of Physics.
-
