Where is the preprint of the paper so that we can take a look?
2013/2/6 <fznidar...@aol.com> > > I set the velocity of sound in the nucleus = the velocity of light in the > electronic structure and got the radii of the atoms, the energy and > frequency of the photon, and the velocity of the atomic electrons. > No cold fusion or anti-gravity was included. I would understand if he > did not agree with the premise, however, how could he not get the thrust > of the paper? They did send me a call for papers, why? > > > > > I regret that I have not been able to understand this paper. What I > find here are equations from various areas of physics -- electrostatics, > quantum mechanics, etc -- together with a a few general remarks about > those equations. So, for example, it is not clear to me what is the > central result in this paper. Is there, for example, being claimed a > new physical theory? or some new predictions extracted from the old > theory? My sense is that it is probably neither of these -- but that, > rather, the claim is that these considerations lead to a better or > deeper understanding of these equations. > > But I am afraid that I, having read this paper, simply do not have > this sense. Indeed, I cannot honestly say that I have been able to > get a good sense of what the is the thrust of the paper. For this > reason, I do not feel that this paper is suitable for publication in > the Foundations of Physics. > > > > > - > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
