In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Mon, 1 Apr 2013 19:06:00 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>W&L now includes a reference to spasers in the following on page 26:
>
>http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=11&cad=rja&ved=0CDEQFjAAOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnewenergytimes.com%2Fv2%2Fsr%2FWL%2Fslides%2F20120706LatticeEnergySlides.pdf&ei=JxBaUbmTJarC4AOe1oHoCA&usg=AFQjCNGIA5OCFP0wCWogsAF0RiKYCnMwRA&sig2=EZC1zIg_0FxZ6I_Rwjfo1A
>
> they site this info
>
>"We demonstrate that aligned carbon-nanotube arrays are efficient
>transporters of laser-generated mega-ampere electron currents over
>distances as large as a millimeter. A direct polarimetric measurement of
>the temporal and the spatial evolution of the megagauss magnetic fields (as
>high as 120 MG) at the target rear at an intensity of (1018–1019) W/cm2 was
>corroborated by the rear-side hot electron spectra. Simulations show that
>such high magnetic flux densities can only be generated by a very well
>collimated fast electron bunch."
>
>An intensity of (1018–1019) W/cm2 is a very high electric field don't you
>think?

I think 1E18-19 W/cm^2 was the laser output, and that the target had no bearing
thereupon.
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Reply via email to