Claudio C Fiorini <claudio.c.fior...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the Levi report, the test started 13 of december and ended 17 of > december. This is compatible with this article. Maybe, it was decided later > to continue the test after december 15. > > This confirms (by the published picture), that during the ongoing > experiment the PCE830 was showing completely useless data, nothing like a > "gem". Furthermore it shows, that Rossi had access to the ongoing > experiment. As the author of the article does not talk about any > "professor" present that day, we may conclude that nobody of the Levi group > could see what he did there. > I do not understand what you are saying here. Are you saying that Rossi was present? Or that that he interfered with the experiment? I do not think that Levi or his co-authors has said that Rossi was absent. Only that he played no role in the testing, and he did not touch the equipment. They verified that by making a video for the entire test: "A wristwatch was placed next to the wattmeter, and a video camera was set up on a tripod and focused on both objects: at one frame per second, the entire sequence of minutes and power consumption were filmed and recorded for the 96-hour duration of the test." - Jed
