On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > In my opinion, people should not bring up fraud unless they have specific > and compelling evidence. I do not know what the law (e.g., US law) says > about the permissible boundaries for discussing possible fraud in a public > forum, but we should not recklessly put this one at risk. >
It is not a problem. Both Levi and Rossi are public figures. E.g. Obama does not sue you if you are accusing him a liar from false basis or that you think that Obama has secretly visited Mars in 1980's. For me the evidence is overwhelming against Rossi and if Rossi is a scammer, this makes also Levi as a partner. Note that this does not imply that Rossi and Levi are doing something that is criminal ― they are just making money! Note also that evidence is only for me overwhelming. This means that my opinion is strong. However I do not claim that I have positive evidence for the fraud. It is just that my hunch is pointing towards scam. ―Jouni
