On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Flow calorimetry has much to be said for it but it is more complicated and > less believable than this. A lot more can go wrong with it, and usually > does go wrong with it for the first several weeks. > > > It is both more believable, which is why it is actually used for calorimetry, while ir thermometry is not (normally), and has the important advantage that you can control and tailor the cooling.
