How much of an impact will it have upon you (Cude) to hear that an ECAT self distructed because the input control was removed? Hum, seems like that has been stated.
Get real, admit that there is no level of performance that would convince you except for the next one you dig up. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Jun 4, 2013 7:15 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:A Couple Hundred Bucks Maybe... On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: There was a time when this field desperately needed a standalone self powered reactor to prove the reaction is real. That is because absolute power was low, ranging from 5 to 100 W. However, now that Rossi has developed high-powered reactors ranging from 500 to . . . 1 MW (I guess?) the need for standalone reactors is reduced. Nonsense, the absence is all the more suspicious. With a thermal-to-thermal COP of 2 or more, it should be a piece of cake to make it self-sustaining. That he hasn't most likely means the claims are bogus. > The only way these results could be wrong would be if Rossi has somehow found > a way to fool a watt meter. If he is capable of doing that he is also capable > of making something that looks like a self-sustaining demonstration but is > not. Disagree. The latter is not in the same league.
