No problems with Krivit, still an excellent, fast and methodic journalist; just he does not like the existing reality and builds alternative ones. I am curious to see his reaction if/when LENR+ goes commercial. Peter
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>wrote: > Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: > > New Energy Times has a preview >> http://news.newenergytimes.net/2013/07/17/iccf-18-cold-fusion-conference-begins-next-week/ > > > A dumb comment: > > "Funding and recognition has been difficult for these researchers. A > significant reason is that many of them give the field the appearance of > pseudoscience. There is no scientific evidence for LENR as “cold fusion,” > yet many longtime researchers in the field remain wedded to the belief that > deuterium nuclei can overcome the Coulomb barrier at appreciable rates at > room temperature." > > I've said it before but I'll say it again: A person without a PhD in > nuclear physics should not make pronouncements like this one. > > > >> and a useful unofficial collection of all the abstracts : >> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2013/ICCF18/ICCF-18-Abstracts-Unofficial.pdf > > > He left out mine. . . . Which may be another example of someone without > professional qualifications pontificating about science: > > > http://iccf18.research.missouri.edu/files/day2/Lessons_From_Cold_Fusion_archives.pdf > > At least I have a better sense of humor than Krivit, and I will be quoting > Fleischmann and Bockris who were amusing people. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
