Dear Ed, The confusion I think is this- the principle of NAE is simple, the concept is actually very complex. \ NAE is actually an other name for active sites known from catalysis, only a very small fragment of matter does the job, all the rest is...inactive sites. It is a natural law, and a distribution. It determines the strategy we have to apply- try to create as amany as possible active sites and try to protect them against inctivation (those small areas are very active but the drawback is sensivity. I am coming from the great (tonnage) chemical industry and had good and bad experience with catalysts. I was one of those who have early seen that CF has ...a catalytic nature and behavior. Simple in principle, but very complex in forms and function, NAE are n ot simple... just imagine the evolution of a nanofissure. Anyway let's now focus on other things this problem cannot be settled now.
Peter On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Peter Gluck wrote: > > Dear Ed, > > I hope my ideas will eventually help you to improve our > theory- this works in case I am really in multiple fatal error. > The future will show, it is nothing personal and i am not angry > because you have told that I am not able to understand your > concept of NAE. > > > Peter, I find that people have a hard time understanding this concept for > reasons I can not understand. I get frustrated when someone thinks they > understand and publishes conclusions based on what actually is a > misunderstanding. Somehow, I have to get their attention and encourage them > to read more carefully, I hope I have encouraged you to do this. > > > What has made me to worry was that you have repeatedly > said that NSE is a *very simple concept* > > > It is a simple concept. It says that the nuclear reactions can ONLY occur > in special regions within the material. The nature of the special region is > not defined by the word NAE. The nature has to be defined by the theory > using the concept. My theory defines the NAE as a crack of a special size. > Other people might choose a different kind of NAE. However, I do not > understand why you reject the idea of a crack being important. The crack > only provides a region in the material in which a complex nuclear process > can occur without being influenced by the rules that apply to the chemical > lattice. > > Ed > > * > * > I think and I hope NAE is NOT cracks fpr the reasons shown > in the essay. Summa summarum, cracks have no future > and NAE has to be a smart concept, complex. > > Best wishes, > Peter > - > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > >> >> On Aug 19, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Peter Gluck wrote: >> >> Dear Ed, >> >> Thank you for criticizing my paper as I have asked the readers. >> I am reading everything you are publishing; then perhaps the >> problem is my limited or absent understanding. >> I hope you are perfectly understanding what you write and will >> be able to show at the target where and what I am telling that is >> not correct, scientific, is misleading. >> I have written first about CF happening in active sites starting >> in 1991. >> Anyway please make your critic constructive by telling us if the >> NAE are cracks or not, if not, then what is their structure and function. >> >> >> Dear Peter, >> >> The NAE in my theory are cracks of a especially small gap size that are >> generated by stress relief in the material. They permit formation of a >> structure that is able to lower the Coulomb barrier and dissipate the >> energy by emission of low energy photons from the nucleus. The theory shows >> how helium, tritium and deuterium are made by the fusion process, what >> conditions are required for the process to work, and identifies engineering >> variables that are needed to control the process. Many details are >> descried in the papers I have already sent to CMNS and more will be >> provided in my ICCF-18 paper. I suggest you study these papers before >> jumping to any conclusions. In addition, If you need more clarification, >> please ask. >> >> Ed >> >> >> Thank you in advance in the name of my readers, >> Peter >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >> >>> Peter, why do you write about subjects that you know nothing about? You >>> obviously have not read or understood what I propose. You have not asked >>> questions or discussed this with me. You make statements that have no >>> relationship to what I have proposed or even to general knowledge about the >>> subject. Please, if you want to be a spokesman for the field, at least >>> learn something about the subject you are discussing. >>> >>> Indeed, I find your approach to be very common in this field. People >>> reach conclusions about cold fusion without any knowledge of what is known >>> about the subject or even what is accepted in conventional science. I can >>> understand why conventional scientists think the people who believe CF is >>> real are deluded. If I had not studied what is known and seen the effect >>> myself, I would be one of them. Several people have remarked to me just >>> how low the standards are in this field. We need to do better. >>> >>> Ed >>> On Aug 19, 2013, at 7:49 AM, Peter Gluck wrote: >>> >>> Dear Friends, >>> >>> Please read, criticize, and improve the ideas published here: >>> >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/some-reasons-why-lenr-nae-cannot-be.html >>> >>> Believe me, I am sincere and serious here, and it is not a case of >>> crackophobia. >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>> Cluj, Romania >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "CMNS" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to cmns+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To post to this group, send email to c...@googlegroups.com. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cmns. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
