I have a reasoning about that kind of big public companies, like National Instruments...
They invest, work on LENR. All is public, especially for national instrument where the boss and the big Physics boss make their outing, and sponsor ICCF... LENR is assumed fraud, illusion, fringe, bad science, scam art... -> so the company is run by idiots -> so the company is in danger -> so the company equity should fall... If LENR is real -> energy companies should crash -> innovative LENr aware companies should boom -> volatility should on companies because there will be winners and losers, thos who adapt or not If LENR is maybe real maybe not -> uncertainty about the value of energy companies -> uncertainty about value of industrial consumers -> uncertainty about the economy -> volatility of volatility should skyrocket, because either there is volatility, or business as usual... I see none of those event to happen ? conclusion : MARKETS ARE CRAZILY BLIND. Conclusion: We should not use markets to estimate reality of LENR. We should not trust markets to price the impact of LENR. PS: it is a known fact for long. 2013/9/30 Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> > (STMElectronics is an 8B~ public company) > > > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < > blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Very encouraging to see this. Certainly increases the probability of a >> real LENR, if not LENR+ effect existing. >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 8:15 PM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote: >> >>> Reactor for energy generation through low energy nuclear reactions (lenr) >>> between hydrogen and transition metals and related method of energy >>> generation - US 20130243143 A1 >>> >>> ABSTRACT >>> An embodiment of an apparatus includes a reaction chamber, a reaction >>> unit, and an energy regulator. The reaction chamber includes an energy >>> port, and the reaction unit is disposed in the reaction chamber and is >>> configured to allow an energy-releasing reaction between first and second >>> materials. And the energy regulator is configured to control a rate at >>> which reaction-released energy exits the reaction chamber via the energy >>> port. The reaction chamber may include a thermally conductive wall that >>> forms a portion of the energy port, and the energy regulator may include >>> a >>> thermally conductive member and a mechanism configured to control a >>> distance between the thermally conductive wall and the thermally >>> conductive member. Furthermore, the reaction unit may include a mechanism >>> configured to facilitate the reaction between the first and second >>> materials, and may also include a mechanism configured to control a rate >>> at which the reaction releases energy. >>> >>> >>> >> >
