Having spent little time in trying to understanding Mills ideas and therefore if someone knows, why does the Mills reaction need a spark to activate the hydrino formation process?
It is natural to expect that an energy hole will extract energy from a close by hydrogen bound electron when the catalyst gets within a close range in any situation. A spark is a high energy item. It’s a seeming contradiction that a high energy event can cause an electron to lose energy. On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Mike Carrell <[email protected]> wrote: > I’m a long-standing observer/participant in Vortex, CMN S and the former > Hydrino Study Group, and now the Society for Classical Physics [moderated > by Dr, Farrell with Dr. Mills as a participant.] For what it’s worth, I > have shaken hands with both Mills and Fleischmann. I think I can give some > perspective on the current discussion. Mills’ back-story includes study at > MIT where he gained new insight into the physics of accelerated electrons > which led to his Orbitsphere model and the possibility of “sub-ground” > states induced by the **close proximity** of energy holes presented by > catalysts. Mainstream physics teaches a “ground state” of **isolated** > hydrogen atoms. The “Resonant Transfer” reactions postulated and > experimentally verified by Mills requires the **close proximity** of an > energy hole receptor of specific magnitudes to effect a **non-radiative > energy transfer** from the H atom, destabilizing it, which then shrinks > into the hydrino state. In that moment, the H atom is no longer * > *isolated**. > > > > In Mills’ current work, the favored hydrino state is H[1/4]; spectroscopic > signatures of lower states have been seen. The energy release is measured > at 200 times the energy required to produce an isolated H atom. Mills’ task > has been to find a means to utilize this energy on a commercial scale. The > above are not speculations, but based on experiments done with instruments > calibrated to national standards by a staff which includes six Ph.D.s and > independent laboratories. Mills’ experiments have included liquid, gas, and > solid phases. The solid fuels include compounds of inexpensive materials > when heated create the catalytic conditions for H atoms also in the > molecule to transition to the hydrino state: hence CIHT- Catalyst Induced > Hydrino Transition. > > > > This is the invention of master chemist. > > > > Mills has been supported by $[tens of millions] from private investors > over a period of some 20 years. He is under no obligation to publish, but > his publication record is exemplary, with over 90 Journal papers, three > books available as free downloads from the BLP website. He has an > obligation to protect his investors with a strong patent position. A irony > is that his major discovery is world-changing but is a natural phenomenon > which cannot be patented as such. This is typical of ‘chemical’ patents. > His patent disclosers are descriptive of many possible strategies and > ingredients [to catch any copiers] while concealing in plain sight the > optimum path which s disclosed to licensees. Mills has shown “reduction to > practice” by frequent posting on his website technical papers at each stage > of his progress. One might see these as ‘field notes’ which with refinement > wind up in juried technical journals listed on the website. Summary and > tutorial information makes its way into the Grand Unified Theory of > Classical Physics, available as a free download form the website. > > > > As of the preset writing, the BLP website is in a very fluid state, which > has led to misunderstandings by participants of Vo and CMNS to jump to > conclusions, but others to dig in and do homework. The Home Page is current > and contains links to relevant papers and the patent disclosure. The rest > covers an earlier embodiment of CIHT with excellent validation reports. BLP > is revising he website and has promised a demonstration of the new device > on Jan. 28 to a restricted audience. Even that is not the whole system, for > it will not include the magnetohydrodynamic cryogenic output module. > > > > Mills chooses his words carefully, and even apparently radical statements > have an observational base. He must present a positive outlook to keep his > investors happy without compromising the growing patent position. The > current device is a compact machine to feed a series of fuel pills to a > reaction chamber and to recharge the pills with ordinary water and reuse > them. The reaction chamber zaps the pills with a arc discharge which > excites them into a reaction state which includes transition of H to > H[1/4]. The time scale of this reaction is extremely short. Expressed in > watts, the pulse is easily in the megawatt range as stated in the press > release. Capturing this energy with a MHD module and converting it to 60 Hz > AC will be another remarkable exercise, but such is within the state of the > art of electric power technology. > > > > There are two paths ahead for BKLP CIHT technology: domestic appliance and > industrial and motive resource. Both create electrical output from any > water source, utilize cheap materials, and create zero pollution. Patents > expire; eventually this technology can be utilized by any industrialized > nation. > > > > The familiar Bohr planetary model of the atom has been very useful, but on > close inspection has very serious problems. Mills’ Orbitsphere model with > spheres of zero thickness of charge orbiting in great circle paths and make > one’s brain creak. In past years there have been savage attacks on that > model, but Mills has given a detailed derivation which has silenced his > most savage critic. A byproduct of that model is molecular modeling > software for very complex molecules which give accurate results with very > modest computer resources. It is marketed by Millsian and is finding > rapidly growing acceptance. > > > > Mike CarrellS > > > > >
