Let me speculate about the magnetic field. My suspicion is that the magnetic field encourages the LENR activity. The additional LENR activity somehow interacts with the magnetic field to increase the strength of that same field. Thus you have a positive feedback mechanism in effect that ensures that both the magnetic field and LENR activity are significant.
I don't know how these fields interact, but the coupling might well be the reason that LENR is difficult to observe. If the coupling is too light, then nothing of significance occurs because the positive feedback loop gain is less than unity. If the loop gain is greater than unity, then you find the device exhibits good performance. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wed, Jan 29, 2014 10:58 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR monopoles. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: How do you reconcile the existence of the high powered magnetic spots in the operating DGT reactor? Why was there a direct correlation between the magnetic output of that reactor with its heat output? What was the source of those magnetic spots in a 700C plasma after the spark discharge? Riddle me this Eric. Assuming we have a basic understanding of the scope and applicability of DGT's claims about magnetic transients (which I don't), I would assume they arise due to something other than quasiparticles. For example, there could be current transients. Why not start with the simplest explanation first instead of reaching for the fancy stuff? Eric
