The referenced article at the top of this thread as follows: http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Axil-- > > Which IE article regarding magnetism are you referring to? > > Bob > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Sent:* Friday, April 18, 2014 5:00 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:RE: Co-Netic AA and the Dirac sea > > The item below is an idem of interest in the IE article regarding > magnetism. > > "an empirical model by Dennis Letts was used...“A Method to Calculate > Excess Power”... predicts that the heat production is linearly proportional > to the mass of the hydrogen-containing material and the magnetic field > surrounding the mass." > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> From: Jed Rothwell >> >> That is fun to read! Good experiment. Good write up. >> >> Yes it is a fabulous, simple experiment that is ripe for both replication >> and improvement. >> >> And it is somewhat poignant for those who have followed the field for a >> while, to mention Les Case – whose shadow looms over this experiment. Here >> is an old article from Gene: >> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MalloveEreproducib.pdf >> … showing the spherical reactor, which turns up once again. Notably >> Cravens >> (IIRC) purchased the Lab gear from Case’s estate. And he is still using >> carbon of some form, as did Case. Quote: >> >> The bulk of the material inside the active sphere is activated charcoal >> (carbon). The charcoal has a mesh of between 1350 and 2000 (micro mesh >> screening of 6 to 10 microns)…. That was selected to match the 8.2 micron >> peak wavelength of black body radiation at 80°C [i.e. spectral radiance of >> about 0.02 W/(cm2)]. The charcoal’s pores holding the metal alloy are >> nominally 9 nm. >> >> That is very low spectral radiance, and to say that there is any peak at >> all >> at this temperature is strange, as the “curve” is essentially flat. Plus >> the >> value seems to be off. Nevertheless, the proof is in the pudding… and the >> active sphere worked for months at substantial gain. That is the >> incredible >> part. >> >> The big question I have for Dennis, or his first replicator, is what gases >> turn up in the ash after a long run? >> >> As the active ball was cut open at the end of the Demo to show no battery >> was inside, the accumulated gases were not analyzed at NI Week. Les Case >> thought he was seeing helium but was he? >> >> Mizuno has presented a paradigm shift with his discovery of hydrogen >> showing >> up in place of deuterium. Is that a trend, of a sort, now that we have an >> appreciation that it is possible? Was past evidence of >> D->2H deliberately ignored, since that reaction seems so improbable that >> the >> experimenter ignored it for sake of his own credibility? >> >> If the Mizuno finding were to be validated in another type of experiment >> then it may finally be possible to approach an operating theory which will >> appeal to the more hard-headed of skeptics. The skeptics I know will never >> buy into the helium spiel without some show of strong gamma photons – due >> to >> helium’s ubiquity… and given the recent Mizuno results – where a former >> proponent of helium is now (effectively) recanting - we may be seeing a >> major change in outlook. >> >> Who will be the next to confirm this? Or will it die a slow death? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
