Anybody who tries to make a start in the LENR business deserves support form LENR advocates for even trying to succeed this difficult field.
Jed Rothwell: "You and Kim hurt your own reputations when you go out on a limb supporting Defkalion." This situation is reversed for you and more pressing. Why go out on a limb and discredit DGT. Is your opinion and objectivity worth only $1,400. One way or another, the truth will be known before the end of this year. As things are turning out, DGT made a big mistake to try and show capability at ICCF-18 to gain support from a prejudiced and irrevocably non-supportive audience such as these LENR experts. Such gestures are not useful in a audience that is so jealous. prejudiced and backbiting. I say give any willing party the benefit of the doubt as long as they are trying. The more parties that are willing to try increases the probability of success in the end...even Gamberale. On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The Gamberale report has a good dosis of ignorance in it (not fully >> degassed >> test with Argon give excess heat due to residual hydrogen) . . . >> > > You can get the same result with a joule heater. They shut off the inlet > valve completely, making the flow rate zero. As in: nothing, bupkis, nada, > no water. The flow meter registered 1 liter per minute. That is a mistake. > It has nothing to with argon. > > > DGT will answer. >> > > Oh give us a break, Peter. DGT has *never*, not *ONCE*, published a scrap > of experimental data. Not one graph, not one table of numbers. Not a single > observation or measurement. No one has ever published data showing a > positive result from this device. The only people I know who have seen it > in operation say "it does not work." So what makes you think that after all > these years DGT will "answer." They have never answered anything. If they > had positive data why didn't they publish it years ago?!? > > You need to get back to reality. Unless these people publish actual data > from an independent test, you have no reason to believe any of their > claims. You and Kim hurt your own reputations when you go out on a limb > supporting Defkalion. Why should you? What do you owe them? Have they > secretly given you positive data? If they have, you and Defkalion should > cut the nonsense and publish it, *now*. > > - Jed > >
