On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> wrote:
> You are twisting words or make citations after your own interpretation. > Most of your stuff is just polemic. > ***So is yours, you're just a crappy writer. > Just fyi my idea about how theft can be understood or less condemned is > not an analogy. You had an analogy, which was good but you did not > understand the analogy. > ***There you go again, giving an assertion as if it were a reason. Of COURSE I understood the analogy, because I was the one who INTRODUCED it. But you can't see the fat lady having ulterior motives because you refuse to. Head in the sand. You're ridiculous. > As you bring up Marta Stewart - isn't she a good example of someone who > thought she was invisible. > ***Man, are you way off here. She had millions of TV followers from her show. Where do you come up with this stuff? > Problem was she did not understand her own social situation because she > was spoiled by being treated preferably. > ***A lot like them there your swedish friends. > Not the case with a few Swedish PhD's involved in a very high profile > technology as unbiased examiners. > ***Umm, do we even know who they are? Talk about thinking one is invisible, getting spoiled by being treated "preferably". > I can hear you are looking for a fat incompetent lady - hope you do better > with that. > ***I can hear you are looking for a clue. Best for you to go down to the corner store and purchase one.
