Except, in all those cases, there are specific TIME FRAMES and LOCATIONS tied to the theory. Failure to understand that is your problem. May I suggest study and learning, instead of ridicule? You know, being a, dare I say it, SCIENTIST AND SCHOLAR?
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Global Warming is the only field in science that can get away with an > "all-inclusive" symptoms list. > > If it's hot, it's due to Global Warming > If it's cold, it's due to Global Warming. > If it's raining, it's due to Global Warming. > If it's not raining, it's due to Global Warming. > If the Glaciers are melting, it's due to Global Warming. > If the Glaciers are not melting, it's due to Global Warming. > If it's El Nino, it's due to Global Warming. > If it's La Nina, it's due to Global Warming. > If the fish die, it's due to Global Warming. > If the fish don't die, it's due to Global Warming. > If the Global Temperature goes up, it's due to Global Warming. > If the Global Temperature goes down, it's due to Global Warming. > If the Global Temperature stays the same, it's due to Global Warming...... > > on and on it goes. Everything we see is due to Global Warming. The > claims never end despite an utter lack of evidence and/or common sense. > > > It never ceases to amaze me how Global Warming alarmists do not realize > that their theory is not falsifiable. Everything that happens is taken as > proof of their theory. How can one discuss science in the face of such > intractable ridiculousness. > > > >
