This has got to the worst calculation of evolution probabilities I have ever
seen.
Surely you can do BETTER than this? It's a bleedin' disgrace..
And stop misusing the "proof" word all the time : D
I do recognize one particular thing though, I see it time and time again in
arguments like these:
The failure to realize what a "big number" is.
First of all, you have assumed SERIAL changes, ONE at a time.
Secondly you assume there is only ONE entity.
Thirdly, you claimed your calculation just "proved" something".
May I suggest: The calculation PROVES you are a TROLL.
So have another go, but scale things up a bit before you do.
(It takes today's bacteria 20 minutes to reproduce, so I don't see why one
change every 140 hours is fast.)
Why are you assuming changes are sustained?
Why are you assuming changes are observable?
The math would say: A very small change x A rather "long time" (from your
perspective) = An unobservably small change.
/Sunil
From: jojoiznar...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: The Absurdity of Darwinian Evolution.
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 23:26:39 +0800
Assuming the most liberal assumptions of the age of
the Universe being 16,000,000,000 years. (504576000000000000
seconds)
Assuming that at the birth of the Universe there
was a single cell lifeform.
Assuming that there are 1,000,000,000,000 changes
from a single cell lifeform vs Man. (There is certainly more than 1 trillion
differences between man and single cell lifeform.)
This single lifeform must produce a change every
140 hours or 5.84 days (504576000000000000/1000000000000) for it to evolve
into Man.
This is absolutely ridiculous. Evolution
rates this fast must surely be observable. Where are the observable
changes we can see?
Simple math like this clearly prove that Darwinian
Evolution is stupid, yet we have intelligent people like Jed arguing for
it. I truly wonder why that is the case.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From:
Jed
Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 10:51
AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Evolutionists As
Idiots
Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> wrote:
To Jed and the rest of Darwinian Evolutionists
here:
I have a simple question:
1. What is your best evidence of Darwinian
Evolution occuring?
There are thousands of books full of irrefutable proof that Darwinian
evolution is occurring. For you, or anyone else, to question it is exactly
like questioning Newton's law of gravity, or the fact that bacteria causes
disease.
I am not going to debate this. Anyone who denies basic science on this
level is grossly ignorant. These nonsensical distinctions between macro- and
micro-level evolution have no basis in fact. They are the product of
religious
creationism, which is sacrilegious nonsense, since it posits God as a cosmic
deceiver who filled every nook and cranny of life with proof of evolution
just
as a trick to fool us.
If you want to learn about evolution and biology, read a textbook. Don't
annoy people who know the subject.
I will not try to spoon-feed you facts about nature that you should have
learned in 3rd grade. Anyone who makes the kind of ridiculous assertions
about
evolution that you make is beyond my help. I spent far too much time trying
to
educate people about cold fusion. When people have no idea of how the laws of
thermodynamics operate, or the difference between power and energy, there is
no chance they can understand cold fusion. It is a waste of time trying to
explain it. I have uploaded papers on cold fusion, including some guides for
beginners. Other people have uploaded beginner's guides to evolution. Learn
from them, or wallow in ignorance. Your choice. As Arthur Clarke used to say:
over and out!
- Jed
