Eric etal.--

It is not to hard to imagine 2 D's or 2 H's inside a face centered cubic metal 
matrix reacting at the same time with Ni or Pd nuclei of the same cell they 
share.  Magnetic fields will increase the chances of interactions by reducing 
the allowable positions the D or H can occupy.  An oscillating field may make 
the interaction more or less likely, thereby controlling the rate.  Exciting 
the resonant spin states may induce the reaction by changing the effective size 
of the wave functions of the various nuclei present.  Exciting both Ni and H 
spins with their respective magnetic  resonances may also change reactions 
rates.  

Despite some comments on this blog in the past regarding the lack of the 
potential for nuclei with net spin reacting, the handle of net spin in a 
varying magnetic field may be important to inducing spin coupled reactions 
within the same coherent system, described by a wave function none of us can 
calculate.   

Bob
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Eric Walker 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 9:01 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi on Ni62


  On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:49 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote:


    Bottom line: As far as nuclear reactions are concerned, I would expect D to
    produce mostly 4He, and H to produce mostly transmutation reactions.



  Yes -- I have no reason to disagree with this.  I was addressing specifically 
the multiples of 2 D and 3 D that some believe have been identified in 
transmutations (i.e., Z=+4, Z=+6, Z=+8, but not Z=+2.).


  One thing that could be happening is that the when there is a capture of a 
single deuteron (assuming this is what is going on), the daughter is 
short-lived in the case of the specific isotopes under investigation, and 
either another capture will bring the nuclide up to a delta of Z=+4, or else 
the daughter will decay into something else.  The reason I do not like 
simultaneous capture of 2 or 3 D at a single instant in time is that it seems 
to me much less likely.  I still think Ed's reasoning is doubtful and that 
simultaneous capture is not the first thing I would assume.


  Eric

Reply via email to