>From James,
> I've seen Rossi deny Windom Larson -- which is interesting given that he says > he wants to give no information on the underlying theory -- but I haven't seen > a denial of Mills's GUToCP from Rossi. > > Has he let such a denial slip? IMO, you are setting yourself up to imagine all sorts of unfounded speculation and scenarios about Rossi's motivations or the lack of them. God only knows what Rossi is thinking from one day to the next. He is so mercurial. It matters little to me what Rossi might think about Mills' work. Likewise, it matters little to me that Mills thinks little of Rossi's work and the rest of the Cold Fusion community for that matter. According to Mills' CF research is bogus science, the result of bad measurements. While Mills may be a genius in his own field research and development, often such genius does not translate into being all that much of an expert in other fields of study, even a potentially related field. I see no reason not to apply the same standards of ignorance to Rossi as well. I don't hold their ignorance of other individual's work against them. I only hope they know what they are talking about when they discuss their own chosen field of study. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson svjart.orionworks.com zazzle.com/orionworks
