*As far as I know, the people doing these tests do not care about innuendos or the opinions of Jones Beene, or anyone else. I believe they have good reasons for "imposing restrictions" (as Lewan put it). These reasons override any concerns about public relations or public opinion.*
*I am glad they published this report. They were under no obligation to do so. We are beggars and beggars cannot be choosers.* I get you. I agree. On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Jones -- I can't say your objections to Rossi being present when it was >> open are unfounded. I think that was a rather stupid move/agreement between >> the parties. Creates all kind of innuendo which they could/should have >> avoided. >> > > As far as I know, the people doing these tests do not care about innuendos > or the opinions of Jones Beene, or anyone else. I believe they have good > reasons for "imposing restrictions" (as Lewan put it). These reasons > override any concerns about public relations or public opinion. > > I am glad they published this report. They were under no obligation to do > so. We are beggars and beggars cannot be choosers. > > - Jed > >
