As I said, we can argue the mix of tests forever, but it is not useful. Yes, I would test using top-100 sites. In the future, if a benchmark claims to have a representative mix, it should document why. Right? Are you saying that you did see Regex as being such a high percentage of javascript code? If so, we're using very different mixes of content for our tests.
Mike On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Geoffrey Garen <gga...@apple.com> wrote: > So, I determined this through profiling. If you profile your browser while >> browsing websites, you won't find that it spends 20-30% of its javascript >> execution time running regex (even with the old pcre). >> > > What websites did you browse, and how did you choose them? > > Do you think your browsing is representative of all JavaScript > applications? > > Geoff >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev