On 2011-04-30, at 22:11, Pavel Feldman wrote:

> I see. It might be unfortunate branding, but the large amount of Web 
> Inspector users refer to it as "Developer Tools". We use every opportunity to 
> tell users that it is the same thing, but this is not enough. The first 
> question we always get is "Do you guys upstream any of your Chrome Dev Tools 
> code into the WebKit?". Which sounds crazy, because 100% of the code is 
> upstream. So it is probably just me trying to use both names to fix this. It 
> sounds like I should be more formal in this case and make the letter of the 
> post conform to its WebKit spirit.
> 
> - I changed the phrasing to use "Web Inspector" only, there is no mention of 
> "Chrome Dev Tools" anymore.
> - Removed all "Chrome" mentions as well
> - There is now single mention of "Chromium" in the example scenario that I am 
> eager to keep. I truly believe that the example makes the post more lively. 
> There is nothing easier than posting this whole thing at chromium.org, but it 
> will harm the "unified WebKit Remote Debugging Protocol" message we are 
> trying to deliver.
> 
> <provocative>In return, can I ask to rename the WebKit blog from "Surfin' 
> Safari" to something more WebKit-specific?</provocative>

I've wondered the same thing myself on several occasions.

> So here is another update (posting the first topics that have changed). Mark, 
> Evan, do you think it is better now?

The update certainly addresses my concerns.

- Mark

_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Reply via email to