On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Dirk Pranke <dpra...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Adam Barth <aba...@webkit.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Nico Weber <tha...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Adam Barth <aba...@webkit.org> wrote: > >>> It looks like Chromium Mac has successfully moved to Skia. > >> > >> I'd wait with this assessment until a version of Chrome with Skia has > >> shipped to stable. Things are looking really good so that should be > >> smooth sailing, but it's a bit early to say we're "successfully moved" > >> :-) > > > > Fair enough. However, I believe the Skia transition plan called for > > removing the chromium-cg-mac expectation much earlier than a Skia > > build shipping to stable. Originally, we were only supposed to have > > to maintain both sets of expectations for about a month. The > > transition has taken longer than expected, but it seems like we have > > sufficient confidence in Skia now that we can remove the > > chromium-cg-mac expectations. > > > > Has the skia transition hit beta yet? It seems like as soon as we get > it onto a version that is pointing to a branched version of webkit, we > should be completely safe to remove the directories on trunk (frankly, > I'd agree with Adam that it's probably safe to remove it now, since we > can always add them back in if we have to, but I can compromise as > well). > Remove it. It is a cost on everyone who enlists in WebKit. Those of us who aren't creating new enlistments are not affected much but that doesn't mean it isn't costly. dave
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev