On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Konrad Piascik <kpias...@rim.com> wrote:
> It is possible to keep linear history with git.  This just requires you to 
> fast forward and rebase before pushing.

But can you enforce in the server? To avoid people to push it by mistake?

> Konrad
> Sent from my BlackBerry on the Rogers Wireless Network
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Carlos Garcia Campos [mailto:carlo...@webkit.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:27 PM
> To: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org <webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org>
> Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Moving to Git?
>
> El jue, 08-03-2012 a las 14:10 -0300, Alexis Menard escribió:
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Ashod Nakashian <ashodnakash...@yahoo.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In the light of discovering that some SVN scripts have fallen behind in
>> >> terms of maintenance[1] and WebKit's strong Git support and 
>> >> infrastructure,
>> >> against my better judgement, I'd like to distract you from being 
>> >> productive
>> >> by bringing up this topic (again).
>> >>
>> >> The wiki page of the same name[2] was created 3 years ago and hardly
>> >> updated since[3]. I know we're all busy with more important things, but 
>> >> IMHO
>> >> I think we can at least update the wiki and perhaps vote on when/how we
>> >> should do the eventual transition.
>> >>
>> >> I understand that while this type of work isn't necessarily very
>> >> productive, maintaining two repositories and sets of scripts (with their
>> >> docs and issues) has a very real cost as well. I'm proposing we reevaluate
>> >> the situation and act accordingly.
>> >
>> >
>> > Re-evaluating the situation is good, but I'm still opposed.
>>
>> I don't use svn but the only benefit I see of WebKit using svn is the
>> linear history, clean, easy to read and to explore. Git repos tend to
>> have merging commits a lot and it leads to make bisecting/history
>> browsing harder (my taste).
>
> I agree about merging commits, but I think it's possible to enforce all
> merges to be fast-forward and without merging commits. In general
> browsing git history is easier and cleaner than svn, and more important
> it's much faster (my taste :-P)
>
>> Then for everything else I use git and its power locally.
>
> I would be more than happy with the switch :-)
>
> --
> Carlos Garcia Campos
> http://pgp.rediris.es:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF3D322D0EC4582C3
>
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential 
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the 
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public 
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended 
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, 
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your 
> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this 
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev



-- 
Alexis Menard (darktears)
Software Engineer
INdT Recife Brazil
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Reply via email to