For what it's worth, I have sitting here a publication that provides the digital filter weights for various low-pass filters. Pick the number of points and the spectrum you want and there's a close fit.
Rob Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 10 12:06:02 2002 > Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm > X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Wget List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Current download speed in progress bar > Mail-Followup-To: Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Wget List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i > > On 2002-04-10 01:14 +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > > Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > If find it very annoying when a downloader plays yoyo with the > > > remaining time. IMHO, remaining time is by nature a long term thing > > > and short term jitter should not cause it to go up and down. > > > > Agreed wholeheartedly, but how would you *implement* a non-jittering > > ETA? > > I'm not sure you can, but using the average speed will at least > low pass filter out most of the jittering. > > > Do you think it makes sense the way 1.8.1 does it, i.e. to > > calculate the ETA from the average speed? > > Yes. > > -- > André Majorel <URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/> > std::disclaimer ("Not speaking for my employer"); >
