On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:30:34 +0100, Kornel Lesinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
If <video> elements would have native UIs, bloggers would be more
attracted of it, and developers of video sites as well. In the above
case, you'd only have:
<video src="http://www.youtube.com/v/id";>
I doubt YouTube would allow that. Such video (even with UI provided by
browser) lacks features that YouTube probably would require: branding
and link to their website.
Here is the answer to their branding:
http://javimoya.com/blog/youtube_en.php
Who wants to strip this stuff, always will.
However, the possibility to do <img src="http://flickr.com/...";> doesn't
put photo hosting services out of business. BTW, referrer checking would
work for <video> as well as it works for <img>.
--
Alexey Feldgendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
