https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13751
--- Comment #12 from Aaron Schulz <jschulz_4...@msn.com> 2010-12-02 21:36:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #9) > > What if a wiki community doesn't want rollback to make the result page > > revision > > have the same flags as the stable one for people with no actual review > > rights? > > Maybe they don't trust such people to only revert unacceptable content. > > I still don't understand: even if you rollback an acceptable edit, why should > the previous revision change flag? If someone rolls back good edits to a "sighted" version, and this new version (with the same text as the last "sighted" version) is also marked "sighted" automatically, then stable version is considered "up to date" and does not show up as having anything to review (e.g. Special:PendingChanges). People may or *may not* want this behavior for users just because they have rollback. There are probably additional reasons people might not want rollback and and reviewing rights to be mixed in a hard coded way; such things have a nasty habit of revealing themselves after code is already in use for a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
