https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13751
--- Comment #14 from Aaron Schulz <jschulz_4...@msn.com> 2010-12-03 18:56:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Well, if I understand correctly your point, this may be a problem only if the > restored revision has some problems which the rollbacked good edit was trying > to address, because in that case something has changed (the evaluation of the > restored revision may change because we know something new about it); but such > a use of rollback is considered an abuse everywhere, as far as I know: > rollback > should basically be used only for vandalism. Well, that too. But I was thinking of the fact that a good edit was reverted and "lost" unless someone decides to look through the page history, notices it, and restores it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
