Am 21.04.2015 um 00:50 schrieb Markus Krötzsch: > On 20.04.2015 23:47, Daniel Kinzler wrote: >> Something seems to be wrong with the order, though. Munich (pop > 1m in all >> statements) is listed way after Chemnitz (pop < 300k in all statements). Any >> idea why? > > Good catch. My query was too simple (using one "random" population instead of > the biggest one). Here is a better query, this time even with populations > given:
I still wonder how the old result came about, since the *all* population values for Munich are much bigger than *all* the population numbers for Chemnitz. Even with picking a random value, how could the order have been reversed? -- Daniel Kinzler Senior Software Developer Wikimedia Deutschland Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
