Feature request:
1) Better selecting of namespaces
2) API output for pagesgenerator in pywikibot
3) do not display subpages on template, project and portal namespace (or
option to hide (*/*) pages)


JAnD


2015-04-30 8:07 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>:

> Hoi Romaine,
> Great news :)
>
> I would personally love it when the Dutch Wikipedians look after their
> dead. It does not get my eye and I think it is important to know at least
> about the recently dearly departed.
> Thanks,
>      GerardM
>
> On 30 April 2015 at 01:07, Romaine Wiki <romaine.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lydia,
>>
>> The Dutch community (on the Dutch Wikipedia) had a voting in which was
>> decided to get rid of all the interwikis on articles, categories,
>> templates, project pages and help pages. The moving or removal of all
>> interwikis has been completed a few days ago, with what we have tried to
>> fix all the interwiki conflicts we found. We also have an active abuse
>> filter that prevents users to add local interwikis to these pages.
>> Instead we actively communicate in person to every user that creates a
>> new article which has not been added to Wikidata. We aim for that every
>> article is added to Wikidata with a label in Dutch and at least the
>> property *instance of*. And for many subjects multiple statements.
>>
>> With actively communicating to users that they should add their new
>> article to Wikidata, the most heard reaction is that they did not know that
>> it is good to have it added to Wikidata. The second most heard issue we
>> hear is that they find it difficult to add articles to Wikidata (including
>> adding statements).
>>
>> For those users who were in the past used to add interwikis are now
>> actively adding their articles to existing Wikidata items. This special
>> page we use to found out which articles have been forgotten to add to
>> (existing) items on Wikidata. I have a templated message that notes those
>> users if they forgot to add their article to an existing item and reminds
>> them that such is needed.
>> For users who are writing articles about typical Dutch subjects which are
>> not expected to have an article in another language Wikipedia, it is new
>> and I have a templated message that informs them why it is needed to create
>> an item on Wikidata, tells them how to, and asks them to add some
>> statements. We use the special page UnconnectedPages to see which articles
>> have not been added yet to Wikidata.
>>
>> Another group of pages we try to find with this special page are the ones
>> that have been removed from an item without being added to an item.
>>
>> The special pages makes it possible for me to just select with my mouse
>> the list and then compare it in Autowikibrowser (still a pity we can't use
>> AWB for items on Wikidata) to have see which of the unconnected pages is in
>> which category, or which template, so we can groupewise add them to
>> Wikidata.
>>
>>
>>
>> So to conclude, this special page is essential for our work to get all
>> the Wikipedia articles to Wikidata.
>> The adding, by the way, we like to to do by hand so that we can at least
>> add some basic statements depending on the subject. Sometimes it is
>> possible to use a tool to create items and add statements to a group of
>> articles, but most of them are done by hand. (If it is done by bot/tool we
>> get like 1000 items with only p17=q55, and that is as bad as nothing.) To
>> do it by hand we make sure the most basic properties are added.
>>
>>
>> The biggest issue we face with using is that the page is not real time
>> updated, and that pages that already are added to Wikidata are still in the
>> list. We then have to do a nulledit on the article to get them removed from
>> the list. Another delay are the articles that were removed from an item do
>> not show up directly. (Was it removed correctly from that item or was it an
>> error or vandalism? It requires a lot of searching to find that out, if it
>> is found.)
>>
>>
>> Another subject we have, but we can work around it by just ignoring them,
>> are those articles that are newly created and nominated for deletion as non
>> encyclopaedic or too worse written to be kept. They are nominated for
>> deletion. The procedure for this kind of articles is that they have a
>> template on them which says they are nominated, and after 2 weeks an admin
>> looks at them and judges if they should be kept, deleted or the nomination
>> period is extended to give extra time to the writers/users to fix the
>> issues. During this period of two weeks the article is on the special page
>> of unconnected pages, of which a part is expected to be deleted. During
>> these two weeks the articles nominated for deletion are making the special
>> page a bit clumsy. (Maybe it is an idea to have magic word added to the
>> deletion templates so that the articles that are nominated for deletion and
>> not connected on Wikidata, show up at the bottom of the articles. I think
>> those articles nominated for deletion should be on the special page,
>> because I can imagine users would accidental add such magic word to the
>> article and a magic word that would prevent being shown on the list is
>> risky for abuse/mistakes. However, as most users start at the top of the
>> special page, the pages nominated for deletion clutter on top of the
>> special page as they are ignored.)
>>
>>
>> In the current special page besides articles (ns:0)  also other
>> namespaces are shown: Wikipedia, Templates, help pages, categories, portal
>> pages, modules.
>> The problem with many pages in those sections are subpages. Examples:
>> archive pages of discussion pages, /doc pages of templates, archive pages
>> of our helpdesk, and subpages of portals are not needed to be added to
>> Wikidata.
>> With categories have another issue: categories of an individual user,
>> those should like user pages not be added to Wikidata.
>>
>> I would recommend to have users see by default only articles (ns:0), but
>> with a menu on top of this special page in what users can select the
>> namespace they want to see, or the option all namespaces. (Like the recent
>> changes have such option.)
>>
>>
>> I hope this gives some insight in how we use this special page. I am
>> interested in what kind of changes you have in mind, and I hope we can
>> still use the special page as we now do. Certainly as we do not have an
>> real time alternative for it.
>>
>> If there are any questions, just let me know.
>>
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Romaine
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-04-29 17:36 GMT+02:00 Lydia Pintscher <lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de>
>> :
>>
>>> Hey folks :)
>>>
>>> We've been looking into performance issues of the special page
>>> Special:UnconnectedPages (like
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:UnconnectedPages for example).
>>> There are a few improvements we can make to make it work better.
>>> However to evaluate if we can make those changes or not I need to know
>>> what you are currently using this page for exactly.
>>> So if you're using it it'd be great if you could tell me how you're
>>> using it currently to achieve what exactly.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Lydia
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
>>> Product Manager for Wikidata
>>>
>>> Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.
>>> Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24
>>> 10963 Berlin
>>> www.wikimedia.de
>>>
>>> Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
>>>
>>> Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg
>>> unter der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das
>>> Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to