2009/9/9 <wjhon...@aol.com>: > I don't think the point is "needing to reach" but rather it's "slapping > the hand that reaches". > Which is a little more pro-active, and less passive sounding. > Is our position to be that, with a reliable source, we need multiple > sources "in these cases" as Fred puts it. And I really don't know what > that implies. Perhaps the NYT can stop being double-faced and come > clean on their exact argument for blackouts. > > Was this even a blackout? Or was it merely the case that there were > not enough sources reporting it yet?
Several days with out the western media really talking about it and that OTRS email suggests blackout. I As for the sources the long war journal is a rather better source than it initially appears: http://www.longwarjournal.org/staff.php And the South African independent is certainly legit if we can show that the article existed at the point it was linked to. -- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l