2009/9/9 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonav...@gmail.com>: > I do agree that it is a bit more than a bit silly to expect > wikipedia to not only surprise occasionally with scooping > other more established news organizations, but in fact > be there before all the other major news orgs with the > full nitty gritty.
I don't. Plenty of stories where wikipedians are in a better position to track the specialist publications where things break first. > However the source of why critics of these two stories > about suppression have focused on wikipedia, likely > stems from the fact our articles edit histories are out > there for most people to see, if they have a bit of savvy. They haven't focused on wikipedia. At most we get a passing mention. Probably more to do with conflict with our generally fairly anti censorship position. -- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
