You'll soon have your answer here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Reviewing#Proposing_a_delay_to_trial_implementation. There are many outstanding issues to address and still quite a deal of preparation to be made. Again people didn't get involved until a launch date was fixed, it may be hard to define one in advance, but that's how it is.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 14 June 2010 01:42, William Pietri <will...@scissor.com> wrote: > > On 06/13/2010 03:59 PM, David Goodman wrote: > >> There has never been agreement for more than the 2,000. It will be > >> necessary to ask the community at that point whether to expand , > >> continue, or end the trial. > > > > > > Ok. Since the 2000 limit initially came from the Foundation side of > > things rather than from the community, I was being especially careful > > not to presume. But from the mailing list and on-wiki goings on, it > > looks like the community prefers a software-enforced numeric limit > > regardless of technical capacity, so we'll plan to leave the limit in > > place until we hear otherwise. > > I think the trial was limited by time, rather than number of articles. > It's a 2 month trial, if memory serves. After that we need another > poll if we're going to keep it going. > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
