I think there have been some discussions at WP:RSN about whether it is a sufficiently reliable source for negative BLP. My own opinion would be that it is not, and neither is the Guardian.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Fred Bauder <fredb...@fairpoint.net> wrote: > note Fox News is excluded from this list: > > External links > * Collected news and coverage at The New York Times > * Collected news and coverage at The Guardian > * Collected news and coverage at CNN > * Tea Party Movement at History News Network at George Mason University > * Tea Party Movement at SourceWatch > > I can make a good faith argument that it is not a reliable source, as I > could for any other news source with obvious bias, but I don't think > there would be consensus on that point. -- David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
