http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&redirs=1&search=t hesun.co.uk+%22Living+people%22&fulltext=Search&ns0=1&title=Special%3ASearch &advanced=1&fulltext=Advanced+search
'Nuff said. Scott -----Original Message----- From: wikien-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikien-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Carcharoth Sent: 04 February 2011 16:13 To: English Wikipedia Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Tabloid sources (was Wikipedia leadership}) On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@yahoo.com> wrote: > For better or worse, Wikipedia in its present state is more of a news > aggregator than an educational resource, and the reason is that the > community likes it that way. Parts of Wikipedia are more like a news aggregator, yes. Other parts are clearly not. Most obviously the stuff that newspapers don't cover, or where other sources exist. Has anyone tried to do one of those network diagrams showing correlations between types of articles and particular types of sources? Some interesting patterns might emerge there. Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l