On 17 Dec 2001 12:44:40 -0800 Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AJ> > In the end, if you look at the larger projects (mozilla, openoffice, perl), you will AJ> > see that any of them uses a straight *gpl scheme. My suggestion is that if you are AJ> > going to change it, change it to something like a currently existing project that AJ> > has commericial involvement (mozilla/openoffice). AJ> AJ> I must have missed something here. Both mozilla and openoffice are AJ> basically using LGPL plus another license. Is this what you are AJ> suggesting? why would that be better than straight LGPL? and what AJ> would the other license be? Just FYI - mozilla actually discourages using MPL and encourages GPL/LGPL (see their FAQ). Regards, Nerijus
