On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Roger Fujii wrote: > would be). And given that IMHO, a lot of wine work to be done > (looking at Direct* and other M$ stuff) falls under the unpleasant column > (ie, most people won't do this for fun), discouraging commercial work > doesn't seem to be the way to go.
And how, pray you tell, is that beneficial in _any_way_ to Wine, if there is no guarantee of seeing that code? Why should Wine care? Why should we? Saying 'someday' is not good enough. Without a bound, it's meaningless. What if M$ says: we will eventually open source Windows. Will that make you happy? But more importantly, does it _mean_ anything. I'm afraid it does not (and that can actually be proven logically:)). -- Dimi.