Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Just wanted to know whether this fell through the cracks, or whether
> there was another reason this was not commited to CVS.

I was hoping you would clean it up, not simply resubmit Andi's
stuff. As discussed with Andi already, this thing is much too complex
and over-engineered. It has to be a simple application that doesn't
require user interaction or a dozen configuration parameters.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to