Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen wrote:
Not even a good idea for Amazon. If you stop putting "extensions" on file names,
There's an in between ground: the files have the extensions, but the URL's don't. As long as you don't have multiple images with the same name (which you wouldn't be able to do while san extension, anyway), there shouldn't be a problem. This way you have the flexibility with much less overhead.
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************
