About 4-5 months ago they built a new national library here in Norway, the architects worked alot with making the place accesible for users with different disabilites. Essentially they did everything wrong. The biggest mistake was of course not to talk with anyone blind or in a wheelchair. There was some high-contrast art on the floor which seemed like a trail to follow to someone visually impaired, they'd just end up in a wall. There was switches installed that would open doors for people in wheelchairs or with crutches, but it was placed about 1 meter away from the door and those who were blind couldn't find the switch in addition to that it was a real struggle for people in wheelchairs because the door closed too fast. These architects actually really tried to make the life easier for people with different disabilites, but they didn't know anything about how these people expected things to work. Now they have to rebuild the whole thing. Don't make assumptions, they might turn out expensive.

When it comes to font-sizes I'd really like to blame the browsers. I don't think it's up to us to provide tools for enlarging or shrinking fonts, just like it's not up to newspapers to provide a spyglass with every paper. Both Windows and MacOS are shipped with different tools to help people with special needs. Among those tools there's a zoom-tool. In addition browsers like Opera also has a zoom-tool and as I've heard IE7 will also come with a zoom-tool. The problem with IE6 and FireFox is that the function to increase or decrease font-size is "well hidden" and they are also very easy for users to change without themselves knowing it.

My argument:
Newspapers comes out with fixed font-size, but people who's got low vision may very easily use a spyglass to read easier. People in need of a spyglass gets themselves one. The same thing applies to web and computers, it's just that not all people are aware of the invention of digital spyglasses. Solution: Spread the word of this invention.

I'm of course also willing to listen to your arguments, you might have thought of something I've never thought of!


Best regards
Vincent


On 2/18/06, Designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bert Doorn wrote:
> I sense an utterly erroneous presumpton that the designer knows best
> what suits people they have never met.
Bert - Isn't that what all good 'designers' do?  The 'consumers' then
decide if they like the design and whether they want it or not.   There
is little point in anyone paying for a 'designer' if they are going to
do it themselves!

Maybe 'provider' is a better term than designer. Or Georg's term : 'Web
carpenter' is more to the point here.

--
Best Regards,

Bob McClelland

Cornwall (UK)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk


******************************************************
The discussion list for   http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************


Reply via email to