We have <strong>, we should have <weak>
Many a true word said in jest :) Trying to add semantics to <small> is driven by history rather than good semantics. Small text is a presentational result of de-emphasising text. We have: normal text emphasised text strongly emphasised text Maybe we should have de-em and de-strong to complete the set :) I also wonder why <small> gets a guernsey in HTML5 but not <big> (the only reference to big seems to be with regards to error handling - http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#formatting). Big text is often a way to indicate a lead/intro paragraph. It's not a heading, it's not em/strong; it's a whole section which is just slightly more "important" than the rest. cheers, Ben -- --- <http://weblog.200ok.com.au/> --- The future has arrived; it's just not --- evenly distributed. - William Gibson ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
